TL;DR
Jon Prosser has filed a formal response to Apple’s lawsuit, denying involvement in any conspiracy but admitting to sharing unreleased iOS information. He blames the other defendant for the leak, complicating the legal dispute.
YouTuber Jon Prosser has formally responded to Apple’s lawsuit over alleged iOS trade secret theft. In his filing, Prosser denies planning or participating in a conspiracy but admits to recording a FaceTime call showing unreleased iOS features and sharing related videos. He blames the other defendant, Michael Ramacciotti, for the leak, asserting that he bears no responsibility for the disclosure.
In his response, Prosser states he was unaware of the identity of Ethan Lipnik, the Apple employee whose device was allegedly accessed, and denies any involvement in the alleged conspiracy to steal trade secrets. He admits to participating in a FaceTime call where Ramacciotti demonstrated unreleased iOS features but claims he did not know if the software was indeed unreleased. Prosser also acknowledges sharing recordings and screenshots of the call, as well as revenue from his YouTube videos, but emphasizes he was not involved in the actual hacking or unauthorized access.
Apple’s lawsuit, filed last July, accuses Prosser and Ramacciotti of a coordinated scheme to break into an Apple development iPhone, steal trade secrets, and profit from the leaks. The company alleges Ramacciotti used location tracking and passcode hacking to access Lipnik’s device, which Prosser denies knowing about or being involved in. Prosser’s filing highlights that he considers Ramacciotti solely responsible for the leak and seeks a jury trial, asserting that Ramacciotti should indemnify him for damages.
Prosser also notes that he ceased communication with Ramacciotti once he learned how the information was obtained and maintains that his reporting was similar to journalistic work on exclusives.
Implications of Prosser’s Blame-Shifting Strategy
This development could influence the legal outcome by shifting responsibility onto the other defendant, potentially affecting damages and liability. It also underscores the complexity of leaks involving social media personalities and the challenges in establishing direct involvement in trade secret theft. For Apple, the case highlights the ongoing risks of insider leaks and the importance of internal security measures. For Prosser, the response may impact his reputation and future reporting, as the case remains unresolved.
Moman Vlog Selfie Monitor Screen for iPhone 7-17 Series, 4K 60fps & Encrypted Private P2P Wireless, Magnetic Back Camera Monitor, 164 ft Range for TikTok, YouTube, Vlog Photo & Video Kits, Matte Black
1️⃣ 🎥 Professional Solo Creator Setup: Designed specifically for creators filming alone with the iPhone’s superior back camera….
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background of the Apple Leaks and Legal Dispute
In July 2025, Apple filed a lawsuit accusing Prosser and Ramacciotti of orchestrating a scheme to access and leak unreleased iOS features. The company alleged that Ramacciotti used location tracking and hacking techniques to access Lipnik’s device, which contained proprietary information. Prosser, known for reporting on leaks through his YouTube channel, had posted videos detailing features of an unreleased iOS 19, later showcased at WWDC as part of iOS 26. The lawsuit claimed these actions violated trade secret laws and sought damages.
Prosser initially did not respond to the lawsuit, resulting in a default entry against him. However, he later retained legal counsel, agreed to a deposition, and filed his response, asserting that he was not involved in the alleged conspiracy and blaming Ramacciotti for the leak. The case continues to develop as both parties prepare for further legal proceedings.
“Prosser denies planning or participating in any conspiracy, emphasizing his role as a reporter rather than a hacker.”
— an anonymous researcher
![TUCCH Case Wallet for iPhone 17e & 16e, Kickstand PU Leather Magnetic Protective Flip Cover with [RFID Blocking] [4 Card Slots] [TPU Interior Case] Compatible with iPhone 17e/16e 6.1", Plum Purple](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51m-x8D8HJL._SL500_.jpg)
TUCCH Case Wallet for iPhone 17e & 16e, Kickstand PU Leather Magnetic Protective Flip Cover with [RFID Blocking] [4 Card Slots] [TPU Interior Case] Compatible with iPhone 17e/16e 6.1", Plum Purple
Compatibility: Compatible with iPhone 17e (6.1", 2026 released) & iPhone 16e (6.1", 2025 released). Before purchasing, please check…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Unresolved Questions About the Case’s Evidence
It remains unclear whether the court will accept Prosser’s claims that he was unaware of the method used by Ramacciotti or if additional evidence will establish his involvement in the alleged theft. The extent of Prosser’s knowledge about the source of the leaked information is still under investigation, and the legal proceedings are ongoing.
BUISAMG Data Blocker, USB A & USB C Data Blocker for iphone17 16 and Any USB C Mobile Phone Charge, Protect Against Juice Jacking, Refuse Hacking, Only Charging (Red 6-Pack)
【Combination set】: More affordable, The data blocker combination kit shown in the main image, which can meet your…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Next Steps in the Legal Proceedings
The case will proceed with further depositions, including Prosser’s upcoming court appearance. Both sides are expected to submit additional evidence, and a trial date has yet to be set. The outcome could clarify liability and set precedents for reporting on leaks and handling trade secrets in the digital age.
Wiaocit 3 Pack Tempered Glass Privacy Screen Protector for iPhone 16 Pro with 3 Pack Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness, Bubble Free, Case Friendly
True Privacy Protection: Wiaocit Compatible for iPhone 16 Pro Privacy Screen protector for made of New Upgrade Privacy…
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What is Jon Prosser accused of in the lawsuit?
He is accused of participating in a scheme to steal and leak unreleased iOS trade secrets, along with another defendant, Ramacciotti.
Has Prosser admitted to hacking or unauthorized access?
No, Prosser denies involvement in hacking or conspiracy but admits to sharing unreleased iOS features after being shown them in a FaceTime call.
What is the main defense Prosser is using?
He claims he was unaware of how the information was obtained and blames Ramacciotti for the leak, asserting sole responsibility lies with him.
Could this case affect Prosser’s future reporting?
Yes, the outcome may influence legal standards for reporting on leaks and could impact Prosser’s reputation and credibility.
When will the case be resolved?
The case is ongoing, with further depositions and potential trial dates to be scheduled in the coming months.
Source: The Verge
